Here in the United States the 2016 Presidential election has been going on so long already that we can trace its origin back to the mists of antiquity, back to a time when Jeb Bush was a presumptive frontrunner, nobody felt the Bern, and Donald Trump was a funny joke instead of a terrifying absurdity. History has finally rolled into the season of primaries and caucuses, where voters start to decide who the nominees of their respective parties will be when the general election finally takes place in November, a day that has been prophesied for generations by the mystical class of political pundits.
|
Major US Presidential candidates, minus John Kasich |
The internet is already full of arguments for or against specific candidates: Hillary versus Bernie, Rubio versus Cruz, Trump versus everybody, Carson versus staying awake, etc. Some of that is good stuff. You should read it. But that's not what I'm doing here.
My academic interests in ancient skepticism may seem like a long way from contemporary American politics. What do people like Sextus Empiricus, Nāgārjuna, and Zhuangzi have to do with people like Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Donald Trump? I think the kind of skeptical therapy offered by ancient skeptics can help those who feel political anxiety about the 2016 election.
I should state for the record that I think you should continue to research the candidates and that my fellow Americans should vote and take part in the political process. I will be voting in Super Tuesday (March 1) in my home state. I've decided who to vote for, but that's not what this post is about. Nor do I mean to start any debates about specific candidates here. There's plenty of that elsewhere. My aim is to try to soothe the anxiety created by those kinds of discussions. Maybe you don't feel like you have that anxiety, or maybe you're in denial about it. In either case, this post can't help you. If you find yourself with anxiety about the outcome of primary season, then read on. There may be something for you here.